❓ A Member of Parliament is seeking details regarding a review conducted under the Premier's portfolio, including the reviewer's identity, appointment process, cost, and whether the report will be made public. The Premier has provided answers, but the report is still under consideration.
AnsweredQoN 2554Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) who conducted the review; (c) how were they appointed; (d) what was the cost of the review; (e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(c) how were they appointed; (d) what was the cost of the review; (e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(d) what was the cost of the review; (e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(g) if not, why not?
(c) Tender Process. (d) $24,101 (e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants. (f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(d) $24,101 (e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants. (f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants. (f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(g) The report is still under consideration.
(c) how were they appointed; (d) what was the cost of the review; (e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(d) what was the cost of the review; (e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(e) what are the break down of costs; (f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(f) will the Premier table a copy of the report; and (g) if not, why not?
(g) if not, why not?
(c) Tender Process. (d) $24,101 (e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants. (f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(d) $24,101 (e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants. (f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants. (f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(f) No. (g) The report is still under consideration.
(g) The report is still under consideration.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
30 March 2004
Response time
28 days
(a) Yes.
(b) OSA Group.
(c) Tender Process.
(d) $24,101
(e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants.
(f) No.
(g) The report is still under consideration.
(b) OSA Group.
(c) Tender Process.
(d) $24,101
(e) All costs associated with hourly rate of consultants.
(f) No.
(g) The report is still under consideration.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.