WA Parliamentary Question regarding the number of registered carers with multiple children, overdue carer record screenings, and overdue carer reviews, broken down by relative/non-relative status and district in February 2016. The answer provides data as of March/May 2016.

AnsweredQoN 4124Legislative Council
Asked
10 May 2016
Portfolio
Child Protection

QuestionView source ↗

(1) During the month of February 2016, what was the total number of registered carers with four or more children placed with them by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district? (2) During the month of February 2016, how many carers had a 'carer record screening' overdue or not recorded by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district? (3) During the month of February 2016, how many carers had overdue 'carer reviews' by category of relative and non-relative carer, by district?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
29 June 2016
Responded by
Minister for Planning representing the Minister for Child Protection
Response time
50 days
(1)        These data are not retrospectively available.  As at 12 May 2016, 76 relative and 91 non-relative approved carers had four or more children placed in the following districts:
Armadale – 6 relative, 17 non-relative
Cannington – 11 relative, 5 non-relative
East Kimberley – 1 relative, 1 non-relative
Fremantle – 4 relative, 0 non-relative
Goldfields – 1 relative, 1 non-relative
Great Southern – 3 relative, 5 non-relative
Joondalup – 4 relative, 8 non-relative
Midland – 11 relative, 9 non-relative
Mirrabooka – 4 relative, 4 non-relative
Murchison – 4 relative, 8 non-relative
Peel – 2 relative, 6 non-relative
Perth – 0 relative, 7 non-relative
Pilbara – 8 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham – 3 relative, 3 non-relative
South West – 2 relative, 8 non-relative
West Kimberley – 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Wheatbelt – 11 relative, 9 non-relative.
(2) As at 1 March 2016, 26 relative and three non-relative approved individual carers had a carer record screening not recorded in the following districts:
Armadale – 4 relative, 0 non-relative
Cannington – 3 relative, 0 non-relative
East Kimberley – 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Fremantle – 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Goldfields – 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Great Southern – 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Joondalup – 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Midland – 2 relative, 0 non-relative
Mirrabooka – 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Murchison – 3 relative, 0 non-relative
Peel – 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Perth – 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Pilbara – 0 relative, 0 non-relative
Rockingham – 6 relative, 0 non-relative
South West – 2 relative, 0 non-relative
West Kimberley – 1 relative, 0 non-relative
Wheatbelt – 0 relative, 0 non-relative.
Fostering and Adoption Services – 0 relative and 3 non-relative.
(3) As at 1 March 2016, 302 relative and 197 non-relative carer households with children placed had overdue ‘carer reviews’ in the following districts:
Armadale – 38 relative, 24 non-relative
Cannington – 14 relative, 7 non-relative
East Kimberley – 14 relative, 4 non-relative
Fremantle – 21 relative, 8 non-relative
Goldfields – 14 relative, 6 non-relative
Great Southern – 6 relative, 8 non-relative
Joondalup – 16 relative, 15 non-relative
Midland – 40 relative, 22 non-relative
Mirrabooka – 16 relative, 5 non-relative
Murchison – 12 relative, 7 non-relative
Peel – 14 relative, 15 non-relative
Perth – 26 relative, 3 non-relative
Pilbara – 16 relative, 13 non-relative
Rockingham – 7 relative, 9 non-relative
South West – 23 relative, 18 non-relative
West Kimberley – 7 relative, 4 non-relative
Wheatbelt – 18 relative, 22 non-relative
Fostering and Adoption Services – 0 relative and 7 non-relative.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more