❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding fracking activities at the Corybas 1 well, focusing on water usage, chemical composition, and environmental referrals. The response indicates limited fracking, non-potable water use, and no EPA referral due to not meeting referral criteria.
AnsweredQoN 4337Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the answer to my question on notice No. 3903 regarding the Corybas 1 well in which fracture stimulation or ‘fracking’ was conducted at depths between 2515 and 2520 metres, and I ask -
(1) How many times was this well fracked?
(2) How many litres of water was used for each fracking activity carried out in this well?
(3) Was potable water used for any of the fracking activities?
(4) If yes to (3), how many litres of potable water were used?
(5) Were any chemicals part of the fracking mix?
(6) Did the Department of Mines and Petroleum refer the proposal for fracking to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)?
(7) If the answer to (6) is no, then why not?
(8) Did the Department seek and receive advice from the EPA regarding this activity?
(1) How many times was this well fracked?
(2) How many litres of water was used for each fracking activity carried out in this well?
(3) Was potable water used for any of the fracking activities?
(4) If yes to (3), how many litres of potable water were used?
(5) Were any chemicals part of the fracking mix?
(6) Did the Department of Mines and Petroleum refer the proposal for fracking to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA)?
(7) If the answer to (6) is no, then why not?
(8) Did the Department seek and receive advice from the EPA regarding this activity?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
9 August 2011
Responded by
Minister for Mines and Petroleum
Response time
42 days
(1) Once.
(2) 267,814.
(3) No water was sourced from a public utility for this purpose. The water used was obtained from the dedicated bore at the drilling site.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Yes.
(6) No.
(7) Not deemed to meet criteria for referral under the Memorandum of Understanding with the Environmental Protection Authority.
(8) No - see response to part (7) of this question.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(2) 267,814.
(3) No water was sourced from a public utility for this purpose. The water used was obtained from the dedicated bore at the drilling site.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) Yes.
(6) No.
(7) Not deemed to meet criteria for referral under the Memorandum of Understanding with the Environmental Protection Authority.
(8) No - see response to part (7) of this question.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.