❓ A member of parliament questions the Department of Education Services regarding compliance issues in non-government schools, specifically concerning conditional registration renewals and differing compliance targets compared to other educational institutions. The Minister declines to name the schools, citing potential detrimental effects.
AnsweredQoN 6376Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Department of Education Services 2010-11 Annual Report, Page 75, and I ask:
(a) what are the names of the ten schools whose registration renewal was subject to conditions or directions;
(b) for each of those ten schools, what conditions were imposed;
(c) for each of the ten schools, what directions were imposed; and
(d) why is the Key Effectiveness Indicator target for 2010–11 for compliance with registration requirements for non-government schools only 92 per cent, when the targets for compliance for self-accrediting higher education institutions, international education providers and Registered Training Organisations are 100 per cent, 100 per cent and 99 per cent respectively?
(a) what are the names of the ten schools whose registration renewal was subject to conditions or directions;
(b) for each of those ten schools, what conditions were imposed;
(c) for each of the ten schools, what directions were imposed; and
(d) why is the Key Effectiveness Indicator target for 2010–11 for compliance with registration requirements for non-government schools only 92 per cent, when the targets for compliance for self-accrediting higher education institutions, international education providers and Registered Training Organisations are 100 per cent, 100 per cent and 99 per cent respectively?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
24 November 2011
Responded by
Minister for Education
Response time
35 days
(a)-(c) The naming of these ten schools may have a detrimental effect on these schools. I am happy to provide you with an opportunity to view these registration documents.
(d) The Key Effectiveness Indicator target for 2010-11 for non-government schools was based on an assessment of the anticipated levels of compliance of the schools to be inspected during the reporting period.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(d) The Key Effectiveness Indicator target for 2010-11 for non-government schools was based on an assessment of the anticipated levels of compliance of the schools to be inspected during the reporting period.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.