❓ Dr. Woollard questions the Minister for Police and Emergency Services regarding the removal of school crossing guards and notifications to schools about potential reviews due to low usage. The Minister provides figures on removals and tables a list of schools notified, leading to further questioning from Dr. Woollard.
AnsweredQoN 239Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
SCHOOL ROAD CROSSING GUARDS
With regard to type-A crossing guards who assist schoolchildren to cross busy roads, will the minister please advise - (1) How many crossing guards have been removed from crossing locations since January 2005 and at what locations? (2) Which schools have been notified in the past six months that the provision of their crossing guard may be reviewed due to concerns about the limited number of students utilising the crossing? Mr J.C. KOBELKE
With regard to type-A crossing guards who assist schoolchildren to cross busy roads, will the minister please advise - (1) How many crossing guards have been removed from crossing locations since January 2005 and at what locations? (2) Which schools have been notified in the past six months that the provision of their crossing guard may be reviewed due to concerns about the limited number of students utilising the crossing? Mr J.C. KOBELKE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(1) How many crossing guards have been removed from crossing locations since January 2005 and at what locations? (2) Which schools have been notified in the past six months that the provision of their crossing guard may be reviewed due to concerns about the limited number of students utilising the crossing? Mr J.C. KOBELKE replied: I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(2) Which schools have been notified in the past six months that the provision of their crossing guard may be reviewed due to concerns about the limited number of students utilising the crossing? Mr J.C. KOBELKE replied: I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Mr J.C. KOBELKE replied: I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
[See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(1) How many crossing guards have been removed from crossing locations since January 2005 and at what locations? (2) Which schools have been notified in the past six months that the provision of their crossing guard may be reviewed due to concerns about the limited number of students utilising the crossing? Mr J.C. KOBELKE replied: I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(2) Which schools have been notified in the past six months that the provision of their crossing guard may be reviewed due to concerns about the limited number of students utilising the crossing? Mr J.C. KOBELKE replied: I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Mr J.C. KOBELKE replied: I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
I thank the member for the notice she has given me of the question, which means that I can provide all the specific details that the question seeks. (1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(1) There was one crossing guard removed in January 2005, 12 in 2006 and, so far, three in 2007. (2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
(2) I have with me a list of all the schools as requested, but it may be more appropriate that I table it for the benefit of the member. [See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
[See paper 2711.] Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Dr J.M. Woollard : What about the second part of the question? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Mr J.C. KOBELKE : All the schools are there.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.