❓ Dr. Thomas questions the Planning and Infrastructure portfolio regarding the efficiency of processing statutory planning applications and town planning scheme amendments within specified timeframes during the 2007-2008 financial year, inquiring about application numbers, processing times, and staffing needs.
⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 3383Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(a) with regards to indicator two – “Statutory planning applications processed with statutory timeframes” I ask in relation to the 2007-2008 financial year;
(i) what is the absolute number of applications submitted;
(ii) what absolute number of applications were processed within statutory timeframes?
(iii) what was the average timeframe taken for applications that were not processed within statutory timeframes?
(iv) what was the longest timeframe required for processing an application?
(v) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the Government target of 80% of applications within statutory timeframes?
(vi) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the 100% of applications within statutory timeframes?
(b) with regards to indicator three – “Town Planning Scheme amendments (for final approval) processed within non-statutory timeframes” I ask in relation to the 2007-2008 financial year;
(i) what is the absolute number of amendments submitted;
(ii) what absolute number of amendments were processed within statutory timeframes;
(iii) what was the average timeframe taken for amendments that were not processed within statutory timeframes;
(iv) what was the longest timeframe required for processing an amendment;
(v) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the Government target of 80% of amendments within non-statutory timeframes; and
(vi) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the 100% of amendments within non-statutory timeframes?
Answered on
(i) what is the absolute number of applications submitted;
(ii) what absolute number of applications were processed within statutory timeframes?
(iii) what was the average timeframe taken for applications that were not processed within statutory timeframes?
(iv) what was the longest timeframe required for processing an application?
(v) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the Government target of 80% of applications within statutory timeframes?
(vi) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the 100% of applications within statutory timeframes?
(b) with regards to indicator three – “Town Planning Scheme amendments (for final approval) processed within non-statutory timeframes” I ask in relation to the 2007-2008 financial year;
(i) what is the absolute number of amendments submitted;
(ii) what absolute number of amendments were processed within statutory timeframes;
(iii) what was the average timeframe taken for amendments that were not processed within statutory timeframes;
(iv) what was the longest timeframe required for processing an amendment;
(v) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the Government target of 80% of amendments within non-statutory timeframes; and
(vi) what number of additional planners would be required to deliver the 100% of amendments within non-statutory timeframes?
Answered on
AnswerView source ↗
⏳
This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.