Hon Barry House asks about the potential transfer of portions of Signal Park and areas adjacent to Barnard Park (both A-class reserves) to LandCorp. Hon Kim Chance confirms that portions of both are still under consideration for transfer.

AnsweredQoN 654Legislative Council
Asked
24 June 2008
Portfolio
South West

QuestionView source ↗

busselton jetty — A-CLASS RESERVES
I refer to question without notice 403 from Thursday 29 May. In the minister’s response regarding public land to be acquired, it was noted that valuations would be made prior to the transfer of the subject land to LandCorp and on completion of project requirements in relation to rezoning and release of portions of the A-class reserve. (1) Given that both Signal Park and areas adjacent to Barnard Park were identified as potential land transfers, will the minister please advise which A-class reserve his response was in relation to? (2) Are both reserves still under consideration for transfer to LandCorp? Hon KIM CHANCE

AnswerView source ↗

I thank Hon Barry House for some notice of the question. For the sake of anyone researching this issue in future, Hon Barry House’s reference to question without notice 403 is mentioned in question on notice 6308 of 29 May. There is a trade-off between the two. The member is absolutely right, but it refers to a question on notice asked a little earlier. The answers to the questions are as follows — (1) Portions of both. (2) Yes.
(1) Given that both Signal Park and areas adjacent to Barnard Park were identified as potential land transfers, will the minister please advise which A-class reserve his response was in relation to? (2) Are both reserves still under consideration for transfer to LandCorp? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon Barry House for some notice of the question. For the sake of anyone researching this issue in future, Hon Barry House’s reference to question without notice 403 is mentioned in question on notice 6308 of 29 May. There is a trade-off between the two. The member is absolutely right, but it refers to a question on notice asked a little earlier. The answers to the questions are as follows — (1) Portions of both. (2) Yes.
(2) Are both reserves still under consideration for transfer to LandCorp? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon Barry House for some notice of the question. For the sake of anyone researching this issue in future, Hon Barry House’s reference to question without notice 403 is mentioned in question on notice 6308 of 29 May. There is a trade-off between the two. The member is absolutely right, but it refers to a question on notice asked a little earlier. The answers to the questions are as follows — (1) Portions of both. (2) Yes.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: I thank Hon Barry House for some notice of the question. For the sake of anyone researching this issue in future, Hon Barry House’s reference to question without notice 403 is mentioned in question on notice 6308 of 29 May. There is a trade-off between the two. The member is absolutely right, but it refers to a question on notice asked a little earlier. The answers to the questions are as follows — (1) Portions of both. (2) Yes.
I thank Hon Barry House for some notice of the question. For the sake of anyone researching this issue in future, Hon Barry House’s reference to question without notice 403 is mentioned in question on notice 6308 of 29 May. There is a trade-off between the two. The member is absolutely right, but it refers to a question on notice asked a little earlier. The answers to the questions are as follows — (1) Portions of both. (2) Yes.
(1) Portions of both. (2) Yes.
(2) Yes.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more