A WA parliamentary question probes the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection's investigation into contractors' reports and plumbing work at 5 Columba Street prior to Mr. Ferguson's purchase, and the request for Mr. Ferguson to contribute $500 towards investigation costs. The answer refers to a previous question.

AnsweredQoN 1735Legislative Assembly
Asked
12 August 2003
Portfolio
Consumer and Employment Protection

QuestionView source ↗

(b) in particular, is the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection investigating the actions of contractors who provided reports as to the condition of 5 Columba Street prior to Mr Ferguson’s purchase of the property at 5 Columba Street; (c) if not, why not; (d) is the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection investigating the standard of plumbing work carried out on the property prior to Mr Ferguson’s purchase of 5 Columba Street; (e) if not, why not; (f) is the Minister aware that the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection has asked Mr Ferguson to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation; (g) will the Minister advise the reason or reasons why Mr Ferguson has been asked to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection; and (h) if not, why not?
(c) if not, why not; (d) is the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection investigating the standard of plumbing work carried out on the property prior to Mr Ferguson’s purchase of 5 Columba Street; (e) if not, why not; (f) is the Minister aware that the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection has asked Mr Ferguson to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation; (g) will the Minister advise the reason or reasons why Mr Ferguson has been asked to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection; and (h) if not, why not?
(d) is the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection investigating the standard of plumbing work carried out on the property prior to Mr Ferguson’s purchase of 5 Columba Street; (e) if not, why not; (f) is the Minister aware that the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection has asked Mr Ferguson to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation; (g) will the Minister advise the reason or reasons why Mr Ferguson has been asked to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection; and (h) if not, why not?
(e) if not, why not; (f) is the Minister aware that the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection has asked Mr Ferguson to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation; (g) will the Minister advise the reason or reasons why Mr Ferguson has been asked to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection; and (h) if not, why not?
(f) is the Minister aware that the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection has asked Mr Ferguson to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation; (g) will the Minister advise the reason or reasons why Mr Ferguson has been asked to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection; and (h) if not, why not?
(g) will the Minister advise the reason or reasons why Mr Ferguson has been asked to contribute $500 towards the cost of any investigation by the Department of Consumer and Employment Protection; and (h) if not, why not?
(h) if not, why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
20 August 2003
Responded by
Minister for Consumer and Employment Protection
Response time
8 days
The answer is the same as that given in PQ 1719.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more