A supplementary question alleges government members covered up involvement in the Balga Works Program/Hurson Pty Ltd matter to protect the Minister for Education and Training. The Premier denies any such cover-up, stating no one was involved.

AnsweredQoN 909Legislative Assembly
Asked
28 November 2006
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

BALGA WORKS PROGRAM - HURSON PTY LTD
I ask a supplementary question. Which members of the government dealt with some of the employees to whom the Premier has referred but covered up their involvement to protect the Minister for Education and Training? Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order! Mr A.J. CARPENTER

AnswerView source ↗

The member has clearly missed his true vocation! He is a prosecutor par excellence, and he should have gone down that pathway! I do not have any provided response to that supplementary question. However, given the tone of the question and the implications that run through it, I suggest the answer would be no-one - none.
Several members interjected. The SPEAKER : Order! Mr A.J. CARPENTER replied: The member has clearly missed his true vocation! He is a prosecutor par excellence, and he should have gone down that pathway! I do not have any provided response to that supplementary question. However, given the tone of the question and the implications that run through it, I suggest the answer would be no-one - none.
The SPEAKER : Order! Mr A.J. CARPENTER replied: The member has clearly missed his true vocation! He is a prosecutor par excellence, and he should have gone down that pathway! I do not have any provided response to that supplementary question. However, given the tone of the question and the implications that run through it, I suggest the answer would be no-one - none.
Mr A.J. CARPENTER replied: The member has clearly missed his true vocation! He is a prosecutor par excellence, and he should have gone down that pathway! I do not have any provided response to that supplementary question. However, given the tone of the question and the implications that run through it, I suggest the answer would be no-one - none.
The member has clearly missed his true vocation! He is a prosecutor par excellence, and he should have gone down that pathway! I do not have any provided response to that supplementary question. However, given the tone of the question and the implications that run through it, I suggest the answer would be no-one - none.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more