❓ Question regarding a refuelling jetty at Maylands Boatyard. Approval was sought but not granted due to environmental concerns regarding flood levels and impracticality of tank placement. The matter is under review.
AnsweredQoN 195Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) has approval been sought for a refuelling jetty at the Maylands Boatyard; (c) if so, by whom and when; (d) has this approval been granted; (e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(c) if so, by whom and when; (d) has this approval been granted; (e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(d) has this approval been granted; (e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(b) Yes (c) Tranby Quay Pty Ltd (previous lessee of the Maylands Boat Yard) sought approval over 10 years ago when it was the lessee. (d) No (e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(c) Tranby Quay Pty Ltd (previous lessee of the Maylands Boat Yard) sought approval over 10 years ago when it was the lessee. (d) No (e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(d) No (e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(c) if so, by whom and when; (d) has this approval been granted; (e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(d) has this approval been granted; (e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(e) if not, why not; (f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(f) if no approval has been sought or given, what action will the Department take?
(b) Yes (c) Tranby Quay Pty Ltd (previous lessee of the Maylands Boat Yard) sought approval over 10 years ago when it was the lessee. (d) No (e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(c) Tranby Quay Pty Ltd (previous lessee of the Maylands Boat Yard) sought approval over 10 years ago when it was the lessee. (d) No (e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(d) No (e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease. (f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
25 February 2003
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
168 days
(a) A licence is required from the Department of Industry and Resources and development approval from the WAPC and the Swan River Trust.
(b) Yes
(c) Tranby Quay Pty Ltd (previous lessee of the Maylands Boat Yard) sought approval over 10 years ago when it was the lessee.
(d) No
(e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease.
(f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
(b) Yes
(c) Tranby Quay Pty Ltd (previous lessee of the Maylands Boat Yard) sought approval over 10 years ago when it was the lessee.
(d) No
(e) The installation of a fuel dispensing jetty was indicated in the schedule of works required to be undertaken by the previous lessee. However, records show that the Environmental Protection Authority and Swan River Trust advised that any above ground tank needed to be located approximately 150m from the Jetty due to 1 in 100 year flood levels. Such a location would not be practical. The requirement in the lease is therefore impractical to enforce and is being considered for removal as part of the review of the lease.
(f) This matter is being examined in the review of the lease.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.